Responding to Peer Reviewer Comments: A Free Example Letter Responding to the comments peer reviewers offer when they assess your research paper can be as challenging as writing the original manuscript, especially when the necessity of revising your paper to resolve problems is considered as well. How you respond to the criticism you receive can have a significant impact on whether your paper will ultimately be published or not, so getting your letter right is imperative. Although the process of responding, revising and perhaps responding and revising yet again can be frustrating and time consuming, it is important to remember that you, the journal editor with whom you are communicating and the peer reviewers who are assessing your writing and research are all working toward the same goal — the timely publication of an excellent research paper. A professional collegial approach that adopts a courteous and objective tone to deal clearly and thoroughly with every detail and issue will make the work of the editor and reviewers more efficient and the publication cycle as a whole smoother and more successful.
Thesis review comments for boeing case study answers
Discussion, conclusions, recomendations, references, appendices, layout | Better Thesis
When Bradley Milligan entered the College of Fine Arts, he saw himself as a traditional painter, working with oils. But during his two years in the Graduate Painting program his approach to painting underwent a significant transformation. Josephine Halvorson , a CFA professor of art and chair of graduate studies in painting, says the diverse exhibition reflects the individual way each artist has developed their own artistic practice over their two years at BU. Milligan uses visual tropes and signifiers of rural America to consider contemporary American politics. One of his two pieces in the show is a wall, constructed of various types of fencing, which he built himself.
What the examiners said
To browse Academia. Skip to main content. Log In Sign Up.
My thesis was successfully examined on 18 November , by Prof. Richard Fay University of Manchester. This thesis clearly represents a huge amount of work which is at doctoral level. The writing is of high standard … ; and there are some places where this is of a very high standard and indicates ground breaking research.