By using the aforestated rhetorical tools, Colson Whitehead competently creates a compelling essay. One of the rhetorical strategies used often and effectively by the writer in order to develop his opinion on loser and winner edits is rhetorical questions. A prime example of this …show more content… We present pasted together parts of our lives to the public, parts of our lives that make us look like winners, likable people. Again, Whitehead helps readers visualize this process through posing questions. The rhetorical questions, again, help his audience to picture themselves going through the same process as the producers, making an obvious winner out of themselves. Whitehead also alludes to a popular reality show, Survivor, in which loser and winner edits are present every episode.
Analysis Of Colson Whitehead's 'The Loser Edit'
The Loser Edit | The Dilettante's Dilemma
I imagine it started as a matter of practicality. When an obscure character gets the heave-ho, the producers have to cobble together a coherent story line. Intersperse the snippets across the hour, and we can identify sins and recognizable human frailty that need to be punished. Anyone tuning in for the first time catches up quickly. The loser edit is not just the narrative arc of a contestant about to be chopped, or voted off the island, whatever the catchphrase. It is the plausible argument of failure.
The church is deeply into the season of Lent by now but everybody knows how that part of the story is going to end. And how did Peter know all this? The church celebrates Easter by waiting for it during Lent.
Therefore, the narrator indirectly asks readers about what is right and what is evil. Through the plot, the readers know about the narrator is insulted by Fortunato, and then he vows revenge Furthermore, the story gives prominence to show that there is a dark side of human mind. Moreover, they change their behaviors by their societal circumstances.