But D is something nasty that we all want to avoid , so the conclusion is that if we want to avoid D, we need to reject A, or not allow A to happen. Note that, as stated, the logic of this argument is fine. Slippery slopes are fallacious only if the premises are false or implausible. Everything turns on whether these conditional relationships hold.
A Rebuttal to the Slippery Slope Argument
The Debate Over Legalization Of Euthanasia Essay - Words | Bartleby
When one argues against an idea or action, one form often used is called the slippery slope argument. In a slippery slope argument, one takes a consequentialist view on the action in question, then extrapolates the further outcome sometimes based on evidence, sometimes not. For example, I might argue that my teacher should not eat chocolate ice cream, because of two reasons: Eating chocolate ice cream stimulates pleasure centers in the brain, and eating chocolate ice cream causes weight gain. Stimulating pleasure centers in the brain can easily become an addiction. It is easy to see that while the two initial reasons are valid, the predicted outcome has no data to support it.
A slippery slope argument takes an initial premise and sees it through a chain of consequences until you arrive at an unacceptable, undesirable, or disastrous outcome. Premise A leads to B, which leads to C, which leads to D, and so on. To better understand this type of logical fallacy , explore the slippery slope examples below. From entertainment to everyday life, slippery slopes are everywhere. Many young students have probably heard some variation of this slippery slope argument from their parents.
For this was not revealed to you by flesh and blood, but by My Father in heaven. By saying this, he states that Jesus possesses the status of Godhood. As soon as Peter says this, Jesus tells him that God, his Father, had revealed it to him. Jesus is truly God manifested in the flesh. Jesus is clearly understood to be the only wise God and our Savior revealed to Jude chapter 1 vs